-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Duskin's Monadicity Theorem #76
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ | |||
```agda |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At the risk of being a terrible person, do these two pages need a description:
frontmatter field?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So true bestie
Reflects-colimit K = is-colimit (F F∘ Dia) (F-map-cocone K) → is-colimit Dia K | ||
``` | ||
|
||
# Uniqueness |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should finish fleshing this section out to line up with the proofs for limits. However, I just need this one result for right now, so I'll circle back around at the end of this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
``` | ||
--> | ||
|
||
If the universal map $L \to K$ between coapexes of some colimit is |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
either "coapices" or "nadirs" (if you want to change the field name), but definitely not coapexes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should change the wording in Limits.Base
as well then!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are correct. That's a bit embarrassing
We also have a dual theorem for colimits. | ||
|
||
```agda | ||
conservative-reflects-colimits |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've done this proof directly to avoid the subst; we should probably do the same for the reflection of limits.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you open an issue and assign it to me I'll take care of it when I'm done with work today
Description
This PR proves Duskin's Monadicity Theorem, and also provides the associated machinery. This closes #74.
I'm also proving the version found in the Handbook of Categorical Algebra
Checklist